The Brussels clock does not stop and Spain has a margin of barely five months to exhaust the remaining European funds pending allocation. With the horizon of August 2026 increasingly close, the country enters the “final sprint” of the plan, marked by significant progress but also by a gap that threatens to become the main bottleneck during the closing period. This is how the situation is described by the EsadeEcPol analysis center in its latest report, published this Thursday. With figures closed as of March 12, Spain has launched projects worth 90.718 billion euros in transfers ―a figure higher than the theoretical allocation of grants―. However, only 63.403 billion of these have actually been awarded.
Read more Dan Jorgensen, European Commissioner for Energy: “The situation is bad and it is going to get worse”
The effective difference, about 27.3 billion, is equivalent to almost a third of the total mobilization and constitutes the great immediate challenge at this time. It is not just an accounting issue. The report itself warns that “granted” does not mean “executed,” which adds an additional layer of uncertainty about the real capacity to absorb the community manna in time and form. Sources from the Ministry of Economy, however, consider that this difference is due to the limitations of the measurement method, which generates temporary delays that result in an underestimation of the real execution.
To further contextualize the meaning of these figures, the Government gave up about 60.3 billion in European loans last December ―73% of the credits Brussels allowed to request― as their cost was equated to market financing. As a result, the total volume of the plan was reduced from the initially planned 163 billion to 103 billion (about 80 billion in non-repayable grants and another 23 billion in loans).
The volume called so far, those 90.7 billion, is not money effectively committed, but the reflection of the administrative effort to launch programs. As Manuel Alejandro Hidalgo, Professor of Applied Economics at Pablo de Olavide University, researcher at EsadeEcPol and lead author of the report, points out, it is common for administrations to “overcall.” That is, to launch more tenders and aids than they can actually execute, because some remain deserted and others suffer renunciations or modifications. Thus, that amount should be read as “published papers,” while the 63.403 billion is the money that has actually found a recipient, a “considerable” figure, he acknowledges.
However, the document emphasizes, “the data that defines the final success or failure of the plan is not what has already been spent, but what is still missing.” With the deadline around the corner, “closing this gap is no longer a matter of political will, but of operational shock capacity.”
The reason for this urgency is that, according to the study center, the final stretch of European funds presents more complexity than previous phases. The easy part is already done, with large infrastructures underway, massive programs deployed, and funds concentrated in large actors and communities with more capacity. Now comes the hardest part, which is getting the money to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to small projects and territories with fewer resources, which requires more coordination and technical capacity.
To avoid collapse, the report proposes accelerating management to the maximum and resolving open calls, simplifying procedures, deploying support teams for administrations and companies with less capacity, and eliminating duplications to give more prominence to autonomous communities. It also suggests correcting territorial imbalances, ensuring that investments have a real transformative impact, and focusing on evaluating results, not just on how much money is awarded.
Read more United Kingdom and France, the most exposed to kerosene shortage ahead of the summer season
From the Ministry of Economy, however, they reject that there is a “gap” of 27 billion. Department spokespeople insist that this difference largely responds to limitations of the measurement tool, which produces temporal mismatches and registration problems that tend to underestimate real execution.
Added to this is the logic of the budget cycle itself. The figures of calls and awards reflect different phases of public spending but do not include later stages such as recognized obligation or effective payment. That is, a relevant part of the execution does not yet appear in those data, which explains why the magnitudes do not fully match.
The Government also defends that it has already activated measures to accelerate that convergence. The latest simplification addendum, which modifies 160 measures of the plan, seeks precisely to reduce administrative burdens and speed up processing to close the gap before August. In this context, Economy maintains that the system is evolving towards full execution and that the focus should be on completing the process, rather than on a difference it considers partly statistical and not necessarily real.
Sectoral and territorial gap
Beyond the execution pace, the EsadeEcPol report draws a radiography of where the money is going, with notable imbalances both by sectors and by territories. On the sectoral level, construction absorbs more than 13 billion euros, tripling commerce (3.899 billion) and information and communication technologies (3.332 billion) and far exceeding the sum of education and health. Under that umbrella are included everything from large railway infrastructures to energy rehabilitation of buildings or hydraulic projects, which partially nuances the image of brick, but accounts for the divergence by type of activities.
The territorial map adds another layer of complexity. In absolute terms, the large economies lead the autonomous calls. Catalonia (3.722 billion), Andalusia (3.090 billion), and Madrid (2.475 billion) top the ranking. However, when adjusted by population, the picture changes completely and places the Basque Country, Aragon, and the Balearic Islands at the top, with more than 700 euros per inhabitant. Economy spokespeople, however, qualify this interpretation and assure that the plan is characterized by great capillarity in the distribution and reception of funds, at all administrative levels, from a geographical point of view and the nature of its beneficiaries. “The data disproves the idea of concentration and highlights that the productive fabric of our country, especially that constituted by small and medium-sized enterprises, is fully capable of successfully competing for access to public resources,” the spokespeople explain.
Read more Brussels demands companies avoid flights for work reasons and asks States to lower train prices
